This is the decision over which many journals are laughing because the primary sufferer is a girl. The primary human couple is now created and Mithra is ready to guard it. And now we’re informed the Ku-Klux legislation makes this hitherto laudable and innocent mode of process against the law, punishable with positive and imprisonment! Because the victims of the Ku-Klux act are now receiving pardons, we hope the fantastic of $a hundred unlawfully imposed on Miss Anthony may be remitted. We’re not debarred from saying “oppressed” as a result of the decide left the nice to be levied on her property as a substitute of imprisoning her individual-in a State through which ladies have, we suppose, long been exempt from imprisonment for debt. We expect as the Judge says in her case, that the Federal Constitution has nothing to do with the matter; that’s wholly regulated by the Constitution of new York. However the chief outrage in the case is that it affords the first case, we believe, In the United States, or wherever in modern instances, of a conviction for against the law when there was no criminal intent.

Has any citizen of Philadelphia supposed that if there’s a doubt as to his proper to vote-a kind of quite a few doubts that come up in adjustments of residence, time of registration, naturalization, and many others.-and wishing scrupulously to do proper, he go to the window and totally and pretty state his case, and the election officers consider it, and adjudge that he ought to vote then and there, has any citizen heretofore recognized that he thus grew to become liable to conviction for a crime under the Ku-Klux laws, if some judge of a courtroom should assume the election officers determined the purpose erroneously? She did what each good citizen here would do, if any doubt arose from evaluation, registration, or residence, as to his right to vote. Yet this, we are advised, is a criminal offense beneath the Ku-Klux law, for which a citizen who has finished precisely what he must have done, might te fined and imprisoned as a criminal.

The proof, or the presumption of this, is important to against the law in the criminal law of every civilized nation. If the matter belongs completely to the States, then the United States have nothing to do with it, and clearly have no right to interfere and punish a person for the (supposed) violation of a State legislation. The case of Miss Susan B. Anthony appears to be dismissed with a laugh by most of the press; but from the primary Institution of a prosecution against her under the Ku-Klux law, we’ve regarded the proceeding as one during which the injustice was not cloaked by the absurdity. I suppressed the recitative of Jelyotte, and substituted my own, equivalent to I had first composed it, and as it’s now engraved; and this recitative slightly after the French method, I confess, drawled out, instead of pronounced by the actors, removed from shocking the ears of any particular person, equally succeeded with the airs, and appeared within the judgment of the public to possess as much musical advantage.

Same-sex marriage is not recognized in any of the world’s Muslim-majority states, although first steps are being taken in Kosovo. Sister Myra is evidently not afraid of being hauled up for contempt of court docket. It isn’t our province to seek out fault with this determination of the United States Court at Rochester. He would state the case to the election officers, and abide their decision. Under her view of her rights, she offered herself at the polls, and submitted her claims to the correct officers, who determined that she had a proper to vote. She submitted her right to the election officers, and they, the judges appointed by the regulation, decided in her favor. We don’t assume there was a case of more gross injustice ever practiced underneath types of law, than the conviction of that lady for a criminal offense in voting, with the assent of the legal election officers to whom her right was submitted.