Then, absolutely, in a case like this, the place there is neither suggestion nor suspicion of corrupt conduct on the a part of the estimable judge earlier than whom the trial was performed, it cannot be improper for a committee of the Senate to inquire whether or not, in the trial of a citizen for alleged violation of the legal guidelines of the United States, a precedent harmful to the liberties of every citizen has been set. A vicious precedent, set by an notorious judge, is harmless; while a similar violation of the legislation by a pure and upright magistrate is attended by far-reaching and detrimental penalties. Your petitioner additionally respectfully insists that the choice of the judge that good religion on the a part of your petitioner in offering her vote didn’t represent a defense, was not solely a violation of the deepest and most sacred precept of the criminal legislation, that no one may be responsible of crime until a criminal intent exists; but was also a palpable violation of the statute beneath which the conviction was had; not on the bottom that good faith might, on this, or in any case, justify a criminal act, but on the bottom that bad faith in voting was an indispensable ingredient within the offense with which your petitioner was charged.

2. That whether or not she had a right to vote or not, if she honestly believed that she had that right, and voted in good religion in that belief, she was guilty of no crime. The district attorney thereupon addressed the court docket at length upon the legal questions, and at the close of his argument the judge delivered an opinion antagonistic to the positions of your petitioner’s counsel upon each of the legal questions introduced, holding that your petitioner was not entitled to vote; and that if she voted in good religion in the assumption in proven fact that she had a proper to vote, it might constitute no defense; the ground of the choice on the final point being that your petitioner was bound to know that by the regulation she was not a legal voter, and that even when she voted in good faith in the opposite belief, it constituted no protection to the crime with which she was charged. Refraining from asking questions once you first meet somebody could be a huge gesture of respect, Airton notes. The majority of the Committee have decided that inasmuch because the relief prayed for by the memorial can not be granted, the Committee will ask to be discharged from its further consideration, and won’t categorical any opinion as to the correctness or incorrectness of the course pursued on the trial of Miss Anthony.

Noah then tells Priya that he pursued Kate and wanted the kiss to occur. The judge then said to the counsel that he thought that had higher be left till the views of the court docket upon the legal questions should be made known. When your petitioner’s counsel had proceeded up to now, the judge urged that the counsel had higher discuss, in the first place, the questions of law, which the counsel proceeded to do; and, having mentioned the two authorized questions at length, asked then to say a few words to the jury on the query of fact. The decision of the decide upon those questions was learn from a written document, and at the close of the reading the judge said that the choice of those questions disposed of the case and left no query of fact for the jury, and that he ought to subsequently direct the jury to find a verdict of responsible in opposition to your petitioner. A laser is assigned to search out the darkness. The choose then instructed the clerk to take the verdict, and the clerk said, “Gentlemen of the jury, hearken to your verdict as the court hath recorded it. You say you discover the defendant responsible of the offense charged; so say you all.” No response no matter was made by the jury, either by word or signal.

That they are not happy that the action of the Court was corresponding to represented within the petition, and that, if it had been so, the Senate could not legally take any action in the premises, and transfer that the Committee be discharged from the further consideration of the petition, and that the bill be postponed indefinitely. The petition of Susan B. Anthony, of the town of Rochester, within the county of Monroe, and State of new York, respectfully represents: That, prior to the late presidential election, your petitioner applied to the Board of Registry in the Eighth Ward of the town of Rochester, through which metropolis she had resided for more than twenty-5 years, to have her name positioned upon the register of voters; and the Board of Registry, after consideration of the subject, decided that your petitioner was entitled to have her title placed upon the register, and placed it there accordingly. On the shut of the testimony, your petitioner’s counsel proceeded to address the jury, and said that he desired to present for consideration three propositions, two of regulation, and one in every of reality: 1. That your petitioner had a lawful proper to vote. Your petitioner’s counsel then requested that the clerk be requested to poll the jury.